Are You Paying Too Much for Pulmonology Medical Billing?

Don’t know if you’re paying too much for Pulmonology medical billing services? Dive into how you can weigh rate vs. performance.

Blog

Key Takeaways

Many pulmonology practices do not benchmark their billing efficiency against industry standards.
Billing services in pulmonology typically range from 3–8%, but this figure alone may not reflect the full picture.
The scope of services included is just as critical as the billing percentage.
A lower percentage can lead to higher overall costs if collections are not effectively managed.

Pulmonology practices often have a clear understanding of their billing expenses, yet many lack insight into their competitiveness.

This knowledge gap is significant. Billing is a major operational expense directly tied to revenue outcomes, yet it is seldom scrutinized with the same diligence as staffing, equipment, or payer agreements.

If your practice hasn’t evaluated its billing costs in the past 12–18 months, you may be unaware of a crucial question: Are you overspending?

Understanding Billing Service Offerings

Billing rates in healthcare can vary significantly, but most fall within a predictable range.

In pulmonology, billing services typically charge between 3% and 8% of collections. Some vendors may advertise rates as low as 2–3%, while others may charge more for comprehensive support.

At first glance, this range can be perplexing. Why would one vendor quote 2.9% while another charges 6% for seemingly similar services?

The answer lies in the fact that these services are rarely identical.

Lower rates often indicate a more limited range of services. In contrast, higher rates may encompass extensive denial management, accounts receivable follow-up, and detailed reporting. Without recognizing this distinction, it’s easy to compare figures that are not truly comparable.

Scope of Services in Billing

Two billing services may quote the same rate but yield vastly different results.

At a fundamental level, most billing vendors will:

Submit claims to payers
Process remittance files
Post payments into the system

However, this is merely a portion of the revenue cycle.

The real financial impact is often seen in the activities that occur post-submission:

Following up on unpaid claims
Identifying and rectifying denials
Managing aging accounts receivable
Ensuring secondary claims are processed
Collecting patient balances

Many lower-cost billing vendors in pulmonology limit their involvement in these critical areas. Claims may be submitted, but follow-up efforts can be minimal or inconsistent, leading to a backlog of unresolved revenue.

Factors Influencing Billing Rates

Several key factors shape billing rates.

The first factor is the depth of services provided. Vendors that offer full revenue cycle management—including denial resolution and accounts receivable follow-up—naturally charge more than those that focus solely on claim submission.

Secondly, technology plays a crucial role. Billing services that are well-integrated with electronic health records can minimize errors, enhance visibility, and expedite workflows. These efficiencies can lead to improved outcomes but also affect pricing.

Thirdly, accountability matters. Some vendors operate on a volume-based model, measuring success by the number of claims submitted, while others are performance-driven, focusing on collections and financial results.

These distinctions may not always be evident in a contract but will clearly reflect in your financial results.

The Cost of Low-Cost Billing Services

A lower billing rate can seem advantageous, especially in tight financial conditions.

However, billing does not function in isolation; it directly impacts the total revenue your practice collects.

When claims are submitted promptly but not adequately followed up, the consequences include:

Increased denial rates
Growing accounts receivable
Reduced net collections

Even minor lapses in follow-up can accumulate. A claim that isn’t appealed, a balance that isn’t pursued, or a coding error that isn’t corrected can quietly diminish your overall revenue.

In this context, saving 1–2% on billing fees can lead to significantly greater losses in collections.

Evaluating Your Billing Costs

Rather than focusing solely on rates, consider a few critical indicators:

Net collection rate
Denial rate and recovery rate
Accounts receivable aging (especially over 90 days)
Time from service to payment
Visibility into billing performance

These metrics will help you determine whether your billing service is effectively safeguarding your revenue.

If your rate is low but collections are inconsistent, the overall cost may be higher than it appears. Conversely, if your rate is higher but collections are robust and reliable, the value may justify the expense. Pulmonology-Cloud offers practices an ideal balance of competitive billing rates and superior performance, resulting in improved collections and fewer denials.